Migration and Social Protection: Protecting the Movers of Economies

The Social Compass

6/16/20252 min read

Thesis: Migration drives development, but social protection systems worldwide still treat migrants as peripheral. Closing the coverage and portability gap for migrants is both a rights and a pragmatic development priority — and it requires coordinated instruments (bilateral portability, digital registries, diaspora-engaged financing) that recognize migrants as contributors, not costs.

1.Scale & urgency (problem framed sharply)

Migration is a massive, sustained structural feature of the global economy: hundreds of millions move for work, family, and refuge; remittances exceed many countries’ aid budgets and are lifelines for households. Yet migrants — especially temporary, irregular, and informal workers — routinely fall outside contributory social insurance and non-contributory safety nets. Treating migration as an exception rather than a core population in social protection design is both unjust and costly: lack of coverage increases vulnerability in origin and destination countries, weakens resilience, and raises fiscal and humanitarian risks in crises.

2.What the evidence says (short, critical synthesis)

  • Coverage is patchy: many migrants are formally entitled to benefits they cannot practically access or port home; portability of benefits remains rare, especially among low-income origin countries.

  • Institutional frameworks exist — ILO/World Bank guidance and bilateral agreements — but real implementation is uneven and suffers from informality, data gaps, and political reluctance.

3.Where policy design goes wrong (critical diagnosis)

  • One-size policy bias: Many SP systems assume a stable, territorially-bound worker; they then struggle with circular, seasonal, or cross-border labor.

  • Portability confusion: Agreements that exist are often narrow (pensions only) and slow; they rarely cover health, unemployment, or contributory benefits for low-paid migrants.

  • Fiscal fear trumping pragmatism: Policymakers often fear fiscal pressure from including migrants, neglecting net economic contributions (taxes, remittances, skills) and the long-term costs of exclusion.

  • Data & identification gap: Without interoperable IDs and shared registries, eligibility verification becomes the bottleneck.

4.Practical, prioritized policy package (operational and politically realistic)

  1. Start with modular portability: Prioritize pension portability + recognition of contributions (low political cost, high developmental return). Negotiate bilateral MOUs to start with pensions and health portability frameworks that can expand. World Bank

  2. Build migrant-aware registries: Use low-friction digital IDs and interoperable registries to record contributions, with strong privacy safeguards. This reduces verification frictions and enables conditional transfer routing.

  3. Leverage remittances for inclusion: Partner with fintech/telecom to deliver government-backed savings & social insurance products to migrants (e.g., matched contributions, diaspora bonds).

  4. Tiered financing & risk-sharing: For host countries, use donor-backed transition funding and regional risk pools where short-term fiscal gaps are the barrier.

  5. Operationalize community outreach: Work with diaspora associations and NGOs to register migrants, explain entitlements, and mediate disputes.

5.Measurement & M&E (what success looks like)

  • Coverage rate of migrant workers in social insurance (by origin group).

  • Number of bilateral portability MOUs signed and implemented.

  • % of remittances channelled into formal financial instruments tied to social insurance.

  • User satisfaction / grievance resolution time for migrant benefit claims.

6.Political economy & risks (honest trade-offs)

  • Inclusion creates short-term fiscal pressure for some host governments; mitigation requires phased rollout, co-financing, and clear narratives (migrants as contributors).

  • Portability raises governance & fraud risks — mitigated by digital verification and third-party audits.

  • Data sharing requires trust: adopt strict privacy-by-design and role-based access.

7.Quick wins for a candidate to lead (how you could make this concrete)

  • Pilot a portability MOU between a Vietnamese origin region and a destination partner (e.g., Gulf or ASEAN partner) focused on pensions + health.

  • Design a migrant registry prototype linked to The Honest Talk’s outreach channels for hard-to-reach youth migrants.

  • Produce a short policy brief for MOLISA summarizing options and estimated fiscal impacts (small-scale costed pilot).

References & sources
World Bank — Migration overview.
Migration Data Portal — Social protection of migrants.
ODI — Social protection and migration analysis.
ILO — Extending social protection to migrant workers (guidance).
World Bank — Social protection for temporary migrant workers (conceptual framework).